Friday, March 31, 2006

movement

Yesterday at dusk, I was once again making the backroad run from Steve’s Liquor to Whole Foods and I noticed that I was moving along with a train, just a few feet to my left side. Pedaling in the opposite direction was a cyclist, in full cycling gear. There are so many of these guys in their tight black pants and with holey gloves around town, now that the frost has returned to Canada (or wherever it is that it goes to in spring).

It struck me that it somehow describes my weeks, this little scene. I’m moving in one direction, slowly and then wondering if I should be pedaling in the opposite direction, against the tide, then resisting the temptation to flip, pushing ahead again.

It was very poignant, this thought of moving forces with their various forms of locomotion. Really. You had to be there. Maybe you had to be me.

In a second, I reached for the camera and, still moving with the train, I took a photo. The lighting was as you see it. The blur? Come now, we were all moving, the camera is set on an average shutter speed and I'm trying not to kill myself, the cyclist and anyone else in sight. Of course it’s going to blur.

And still, I like the photo. Me moving with the train, then against it, then, finally, turning off (to Whole Foods) while the pattern of movement continued without me.


Madison Mar 06 599

3 comments:

  1. Einstein would be proud. I like it!

    Lili

    ReplyDelete
  2. The post made me think of Einstein too! :)

    If Nina had thrown a ball at the bicyclist, a viewer in a stationary reference frame would have seen...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, in light of special relativity, I wonder what other viewers of Nina's life see when they observe her moving in her particular direction. Are we stationary, or moving too--with the bike or the train?




    That my friends is the whisky and ginger ale talkin'!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.