Thursday, August 15, 2024

to Sissinghurst

How do I even begin to describe the pull I feel toward Sissinghurst... Let's start with this question: do you know about Sissinghurst? You don't? Let me describe its essentials.

Sissinghurst was the home of Vita Sackville-West (an author person and gardener extraordinaire) and her husband Harold Nicolson (a politician, diplomat, and also author person and gardener). They lived there from 1930 until she died in 1962 and he died in 1968. Their son, Nigel signed the property to the care and oversight of the National Trust in 1967, so that it could, well, continue to be cared for in a proper way. (Even as he stayed on, as did Vita's grandson.)

The property consists of some structures, a few crumbling walls and gardens. The Cottage Garden, the White Garden, the Purple Border -- but I'm getting ahead of myself. Because it's not just about flowers. Sissinghurst really is Vita's creation and it reflects her ideas about, well everything! Gardening to be sure: maximalist abundance! Minimalism, which I love in principle, doesn't belong in gardens. Here, bounty must rule. But Vita embodied more than just a passion for growing things. She had ideas and convictions that went against the grain of conventional life and, oh, maybe thirty years ago, I read about her, and I read her correspondence with Virginia Woolf (who was her lover for a while) and I was fascinated by it all. I always felt a pull toward those who bucked convention and I thought how it must be to let loose, at least at the edges. It's not easy to live according to your own moral compass, without fear of judgment. Of course, eventually I met Ed and with him, and with retirement, and with age, I relaxed and it became easier. 

Of course, Ocean is one big stand against convention. Who do you know that publishes daily updates on life as lived over the span of decades? And doesn't care that this just isn't done? And that so many frown at this behind your back (or not behind your back)?

But there's more: Vita surrounded herself with people who stood by her despite her peculiarities, if you want to call them that. I found this intriguing: she stayed married despite her passionate affairs with women. (It should be noted that Harold also had affairs -- his with men. But from what I've read, they also adored each other.) She had two kids, and eventually grandchildren, and yet she remained her own person. And all that is reflected in the ideas that drove her to throw herself with passion into the project of creating the gardens of Sissinghurst. And writing about gardening in a way that's beautiful, unusual and quite touching.

 Sometime in early spring, when I was toiling away at yet another garden expansion at the farmette -- this time pushing the Big Bed more into the courtyard -- I returned in my thoughts to Sissinghurst. I knew I'd be in Europe in August. The Poland trip. Why not stop in Sissinghurst on the return home? It proved to be a not so hard addition: a night in London, then a train ride to Staplehurst (near Sissinghurst)  and then two nights at Sissinghurst Castle Farmhouse before returning home.

That's the backstory. Now for this London morning:

Breakfast in the UK is always kind of predictable. Eggs with sausage, tomato, beans, with a toast rack of once warm toast. Brown or white. Or, better yet -- porridge, which is, I think, a horrible term they use for oatmeal. At my hotel, breakfast is slow, charming, and nicely decadent (meaning croissants, berries, etc.). I choose porridge.




My train to Staplehurst isn't until 1 pm, so I ramble around a little, sticking to my neighborhood, ultimately poking into the Harrods Department Store (Ed reminded me that I need nothing and therefore should buy nothing, even if Air France can and will pay for it) and especially its Food Halls. This is a very pleasant memory for me: Harrods Food Halls were my first introduction into the exquisite world of quality food, back when I was in London more frequently because my then husband did research on intellectual movements in England of past centuries. Sure, everything in the Food Halls was too expensive for us, but I'd never quite seen anything like this before (this was back in the late 70s and early 80s). A passion and dedication to quality in food. In London of all places. 

 


I do notice that what has happened to Harrods overall has also happened to the Food Halls. All of these food emporia are for the well heeled (pun intended). But Harrods is, in my view for the super well heeled. There are at least shelves of affordable biscuits in Paris' Bon Marche -- the French counterpart to this. In Harrods, there is nothing affordable in the whole store. (Can you tell by the photo above?)

I remember I got harshly reprimanded back in the day, for taking out my camera and trying to photograph what I saw. How times have changed...

(so British: Beef Wellington)



(so British: pigeon)



I see a Harrods uptick in poshness very quickly as I look around in the "casual" women's clothing department to pick up something I can charge to Air France when I send them my mildly annoyed letter. (The suitcase is now scheduled to arrive tonight, in London, even as I will already be gone.) I spend about 30 minutes there and I find nothing. Absolutely nothing. Not a sweater or a t-shirt -- nothing at all that I could justify as an essential replacement for things Air France is holding onto. 

Not wanting to completely let go of my privileged position of great need as a consequence of their inept handling of my bag, I buy a face cream and a lipstick. Terribly expensive, but hey, these are essentials if you're without your cosmetics bag for a whole 24 hours plus, don't you think? (Receipts saved.)

Okay, time to take that train to Staplehurst. I leave instructions for my suitcase at the hotel and travel with just my tote. This fortuitous division of clothes took mega planning on my part! My Polish friends laughed that I had a list of what I would wear when, and what I would need on which day. But I had to do that! It's that or you over-pack!

And now it's time to go to Charring Cross Station. Crosssing the city as I go from my hotel to Charring Cross makes me realize that it's not just Harrods and the environs that draw crowds. London is teeming with people! So many visitors milling about! It's packed!

The Station itself, though, is great in that it has seats and the information board clearly tells you what train is pulling up where and when you can get on and what stops are on the way. Important word here: *clearly* and to be seen from all points in the big waiting room. You don't often see that in train stations (I'm lookin' at you, Madrid!). 

 

 

I take the train on the comfy Souteastern line, with Wifi. Train travel has gotten a lot of disgusted and scornful press in recent months in the UK, but anecdotally, I can report that not only was Charring Cross station comfy, but it was well stocked: people enjoyed their pasties while they waited.




I bought a glossy for the ride. (Can you guess which one?)




Yes of course -- the one with the "Save the Albion Cow" headline.

(train view, moving out of London across the Thames)



My home for the next two nights is jaw-dropping awesome: it is part of the Sissinghurst estate and it was once part of Vita and Harold's orbit: the Sissinghurst Farmhouse. Right now it is of course owned by the National Trust. Sort of. The Trust owns the "brick and mortar" of the house, but they lease the inside for a ten year period -- currently it's in the hands of Richard and Anna, a couple that furnish, take care of and operate the b&b.  And yes, you can walk from it right up to the gardens. 

Richard picks me up at the station and we talk about Sissinghurst, the set up with the Farmhouse, their work as b&b hosts. (I haven't met anyone who likes to do this for decades upon decades; I suppose you wear out changing towels and greeting guests, especially in a place like this where the average stay he tells me is 1.5 days.) 

The Farmhouse b&b:



View from my room is toward the rest of the estate:




Check in is at 4 and so I have an hour to kill. I walk over to the Sissinghurst Estate coffee shop and buy a crumble and a latte.




(In the coffee shop: the iconic photo of Vita and Harold)



And then I meander. Over to the gift shop.

Mistake.

You cannot imagine a more attractive gift shop for me than one that bases itself on these gardens, and on these writers who once lived here, and the art that they collected (think: Bristol Blue glass vases and bottles). Time flies when you're picking out cards *and such* to take home.

Outside again, I look out toward the fields: sheep, with birds on their backs...




I peak out at the entrance to the gardens and rest of the estate and talk to the ticket guard about optimal times to visit:



And then I return to the b&b to check in.

At the Farmhouse, Richard points me to the living room where they serve afternoon tea and freshly baked cakes and scones. Today it's lemon raspberry cake and scones with the whole clotted cream and jam deal. Of course, I just have to!




And I do that walk to the gardens for the first time today. The tickets person told me that the time when it's least crowded is in the last hour. The gardens close at 5:30. I'm there at 4:30 (and by the end, I have the entire huge place to myself). 

First, let me include here the Elizabethan Tower, because this is what first attracted Vita to the place (Harold, on the other hand, was swayed by the nut trees) back in 1930, when she first saw it.

 


 

You can climb up to take in the views, but, too, halfway up is where Vita chose to sequester herself to write. Harold never went there. Maybe two or three times in the decades they lived at Sissinghurst. The room has no windows, but a few more steps would lead you out to see Kent's landscape unfold before you. 

(And an inadequate photo for you of her room since you can't go inside it, and the Tower is narrow, so capturing the entirety or even her desk to the side is impossible...)


 

(along the Tower's stairwell...)



The views from the top:










I'm especially curious how the gardens fare in August, because this is a tough time for us gardeners in the northern climes. In late spring everything feels fresh, hopeful, abundant. In August it feels like you've made too many mistakes and allowed too much expansion in places where you wanted no expansion at all (phloxes, go easy on your neighbors!). Many of us basically throw up our hands and give up until next year.

So how is it in Sissinghurst?

It is at once more abundant and different than I had expected. Much more August-y. Not so much depleted, as in its "senior" phase. In Giverny, they make sure that each season explodes with color and abundance. But Vita (I read) saw this differently. She allowed her garden to transform itself as the season progressed. The National Trust follows her in this, though in some places, it has planted a few annuals --  dahlias come to mind -- to at least hint at what it's like there earlier in the summer. I'm going to post tons of pics from my walk today, but it'll be haphazard, reflecting my rather haphazard walk through it. I went where my eyes took me, ignoring the maps, the notes I had. That's the way I'll post photos today.




(Vita loved climbing roses)



(familiar to me glads!)












(a clematis, climbing a tree)



(In the last half hour, it was only him and me...)









(the White Garden is only a little white in August...)



























So, was it absolutely inspiring? I think, in the end, that's the wrong word. Vita's garden and mine are hugely different, not only because she had sunshine galore (Ed! the trees! shade!), and magnificent crumbling walls as backdrops, but she also had gardeners working for her. She'd buy, they'd do the labor. (Yes, she and Harold came from wealth, and when her mother died and left her fortunes in part to her daughter, Vita and Harold put a heck of a lot of that fortune into Sissinghurst.)

But if not inspiring, then what?

Affirming. In the end, I truly think I understand her intent here and I share that intent on my own small scale and with sometimes different interpretations and expectation. I share, for example, her love of climbers. Vita discovered clematis late, but when she did, she incorporated it into her scheme with alacrity! I myself have 10 clematis climbing up houses, poles, trunks and trees. And I also love vines as backdrops. And she uses the gladiolus murielae bulbs! (I say "she" because the gardeners here try to stay faithful to her planting ideas). But more importantly, she strives for an effect that I understand and love and then let go of in August. On a small scale and with less knowledge to be sure. But I think given my means and energies, I'm experimenting in similar directions. (Think, too, meadows and orchards!)


In a separate building they had the library room where they entertained. Rarely. These were not party people, though each, of course, had strong relationships with others. All kinds of relationships. Yet their continued love for each other is well documented. I've always been impressed by that. Jealousy did not figure into their lives. A rare pair indeed!


In the evening I get a lift from Richard over to the Three Chimneys Restaurant. The weather turned from windy and mostly cloudy to wet and totally overcast. The dining spot itself is your classic English country pub type eatery. Three hundred years old, they claim. Award winning, they claim ("best pub dining in Kent!"). Locally sourced ingredients, they claim. My hosts' favorite eatery. Let's take a look:

 



Past the tumult of the pub...




... there is a vast dining room with a chalk board menu. I take the soup of the day (cauliflower and garlic) and the salmon (over spinach and potatoes). And because I'm in a British pub, I stick with their tap beer.




And it is all excellent! The soup is dense and flavorful, the fish -- perfectly prepared. One fourth the price of London, twice the tastiness. I'm not surprised.

It's very very late when I finally turn out the light. The Internet here is breathtakingly slow and I posted a record 43 photos today, each one taking seemingly hours to load. But I'm deeply content. Vita and Harold's garden, struggling between privacy and openness to the public in their lifetime, reminds me of my own ambivalence with this. As you know the farmette gardens are exceptionally private. Almost no one sees them in person. At the same time, I post endless photos of them here, on Ocean. Vita wrote about her gardening experiences in great detail (and wit and wisdom) for the Observer, without specifically mentioning what she was describing -- Sissinghurst. When she and Harold experimented with opening the estate to visitors (for a year or two they did this, for a couple of hours a week, charging a small entrance fee which you dropped in a bucket), Harold was appalled at the occasional presence of strangers. Vita, on the other hand, accepted it as a price to pay for having others see her work.

Tomorrow, I'll return to the gardens. Tonight, I have to log in some sleep!


Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Poland 10: from Warsaw to London

I    Last Thoughts on Poland as I Take Off

You've picked up the running theme here: when I am in Warsaw, it's hard to forget the past. The thing is, it's not just me. Poles are stuck with carrying the burden of the country's history. Recent history at that. My parents' generation could not possibly shake off their war memories (though my mother was spared that: she lived in the US when the war broke out in Europe), memories of the political upheaval as the Soviet Union became the de facto dictator of our country's future. My own generation was stuck with that burden as well: when I was a kid, it was not unusual to come across heaps of rubble where buildings once stood. Warsaw struggled to rebuild herself from really nothing without much help from anyone. We saw that. And a crazy drama continued to unfold all through a postwar Pole's life: the revolt against authoritarianism, the pushback and strategically positioned tanks from the Soviets, then the beginning of the end, starting in 1968 when I was still in high school: the student uprising, and for all my friends who then married or had children -- the imposition of martial law (1981: the year my daughter was born in Wisconsin, never really having to grasp any of this), the fear of what would come next, the birth of Solidarity, and in 1989 the collapse of the dictatorship, but too, of at least some of the safeguards -- of guaranteed work (lousy pay, nothing to buy, but you had a job), of free social services, and the plunge into the hefty and risky world of a competitive market economy. Then, one last dig in your ribs: the threat of authoritarian rule in this century, which only this past year diminished, as a result of a brilliant turnout at Poland's democratic elections, with the return of a cautious optimism, but with a hefty bit of worry as Russia inched closer to Poland once again with its war in the Ukraine. My friends lived through all that. How can they possibly not look back, compare, worry?

And when I am here, I look back too, and I add a layer of memory,  one that perhaps could be anyone's, anywhere -- family stuff. My Warsaw years were tumultuous at home. Ultimately, my parents' marriage broke up, but in the years they were still seemingly together, there wasn't much that you'd call happy or warm. All their energies went into something other than their kids. Which, of course, made it easier for me to leave Poland, leave them, engage in a new life in New York, look forward to what I could do with it there.

I don't like to look back too much. Ed and I live about as "in the present" as you can get. Sure, I do like to look forward (he does not), but not much to my past. 

Do you see why I so rarely come to Poland? If not for a few close friends and my sister and her son, I'd probably not go back at all. It's just not me to bombard my emotions in this way. I wrote LAS -- that was my last hurrah, last plunge into the chaos of my childhood and adolescence. Sure, I'll always want to bring the kids to Warsaw, to show them where, in part, they came from. But without that connection to those I love here, would I come alone? Rarely, if ever. I adore Poland, but I don't feel the need to repeatedly shoulder all the weight of her past and my past while I lived here.


II   A Morning Meal and a Morning Walk

This morning reminded me that to that love for my "old country," I'll add a love for and delight in the hotel that was my home in Warsaw for nine days. The Puro staff is always there, always helpful, always smiling. You want blueberries, they'll get you blueberries. Used breakfast dishes are quickly removed. You ask for water in your room, suddenly a  half a dozen cans appear on your table. You click "make up room" on the tablet and go down to breakfast, you come back up and it's all done. Great staff training, great room, great location. Total winner.

(breakfast: the foods I ate)



(the foods I did not eat -- except for the herring, yesterday)



I have about a half hour before I have to leave for the airport. A perfect amount of times to once again head toward the post office, the nicer one on Plac Trzech Krzyzy (haven't learnt to say it yet? it sounds something like Platz Tshehh Kshi-zhi), to mail a card, but really to give one last hard look at the face of Warsaw.

(waiting for the light, 1)



( a flag, a dad, two kids, and a post-communist era milk bar)


 

 

(waiting for the light, 2)


 

And then it's a quick ride to the airport (when there is no traffic, it's a 20 minute cab ride!), the usual wait for ticketing, for security, the inevitable delay that always comes with a Warsaw - Paris flight (I dont know why, but it is always late coming in, and thus late going out; this time they blame a storm over Hamburg... whatever!), the two hour flight to Paris, the rush to connect to the next leg-- the on-time flight to London.

 

III    Why London?!

To London?? -- you ask. How strange to add this to an already long (for me) trip. Didn't you once write (you ask) that you weren't especially fond of London?

It's true -- I'm not fond of it. Big city, interesting history, good museums. Expensive hotels, expensive food, a feeling of being stuck in the past or catapulted into a fast paced future, allowing too much wealth to set boundaries as to who can really live in or outside the city center. I don't even much like the parks. They feel urban. Like Central Park in New York. 

So why London? Well, I'm not really here for London. I'm here for an outing I want to do tomorrow, which I'll tell you about tomorrow. Tonight, my sole goal is to get my hotel -- the Knightsbridge, because I know the area -- it's fairly central, yet also fairly quiet -- and to eat dinner and to get some sleep.

The plan goes sort of haywire when Air France manages to not load my suitcase at the Paris airport. Oh it will arrive later tonight, but the delivery service is done for the day, so expect it tomorrow afternoon. After I will have already left London.

This sounds a lot more dramatic than it is. As luck would have it, I packed a separate bag with things that I need for England and I have that bag with me. There is nothing in the suitcase with the exception of a jar of cream that I absolutely need for the remaining days of the trip.

However.

Air France had plenty of time to load my suitcase and as a serious AF frequent flyer, I supposedly get all their perks and privileges, including priority luggage service. Whatever that means. I am sufficiently miffed at them that I intend to go shopping at Harrods Department Store tomorrow morning for a new outfit and new cosmetics and send them the bill. Which they will pay, because it's happened before and they're good that way.

In the meantime, I cab to my hotel. I could have taken the train but this would have really complicated my arrival time. This way I listened to the non stop chatter of the cab driver (it was rush hour so it took a full hour), who was somewhere between Borris Johnson and Trump in his political leanings, but I blame this on his overall disinterest in the fate of our country, to the point that for the life of him, he could not place Wisconsin on the map, thinking it to be just a few miles up north from New York City, and he hadn't a clue about Harris and only his manners probably prevented him from commenting on her gender or race. Though perhaps the English aren't as batty about stuff like that as some of the people back home. Still, I regard him as highly suspect since he admitted that he'd only been to Scotland once -- just to Glasgow of all urban and thus uninteresting places (sorry, I do like Glasgow but gee, if you live in England shouldn't you go a bit further out into the countryside?).

The hotel is very nice -- it's the cheapest from the very good and reliable Firmdale collection. It tries not to be too old fashioned (they all try not to be too old fashioned), still, after the modern ethos of the Puro, it feels charmingly enough old fashioned. But so discreet is it, that when the cab drove up, I asked -- are you sure this is it? I could not find any sign announcing its presence.

 



(my room: simple but large)



(my view)



I got upgraded to a Junior Suite -- who knows why. I haven't luggage to unpack and I'm not here even 24 hours, but there you have it. I can sit on a couch for a few minutes tonight to soak in the extra comfort.

I booked dinner at Elystan Street. You have no idea how hard it was to find a place that would be moderately priced, not too far from where I'm staying, with interesting food. You, who love the British food scene will protest: London is great for eating out! Say what you may, I always have problems here. Not wanting stodgy, formal, old world, expensive, I spend hours searching for something that will fit my parameters. Hours!

My impressions? Well, often when I eat in England I think -- they're getting the ingredients right at least, but I'm not convinced they've got the flavors right. They're just a little bit heavy. The sauces take charge rather than enhance. Elystan Street had a great write up. I think it had or has a Michelin star. People like it. But of the three dishes I tried (ravioli with seafood, a girolle and pea tart, and white peaches with red fruits and bits of meringue -- which sounded like it was made for me! -- none would I order again. Too, the restaurant is in Chelsea (17 mins from my hotel) and the diners were all of a kind. Like maybe you'd find on the upper east side of Manhattan. The staff was fabulous, the aperitif was fabulous, the setting was fabulous, the table they gave me was the best in the room. But either I ordered poorly, or I wasn't hungry enough (two AF flights meant I had TWO lunches today! Forty minute flight from Paris to London,  and they give you a lunch!), or perhaps I have just outgrown heavily sauced foods.                                                                                                                                



Walking back at night, I also had second thoughts about staying in this neighborhood again. Long long ago, when I'd come here as a young adult, it seemed awesome. British. Close to the park (such as it is), close to Harrods (for those Food Halls). Now it seems glitzy and trashy both at the same time. Garbage on the streets kind of thing. Harrods attracts tourism from the Arab states in the summer (because it's so hot in the countries from where they hail right now) and so the wealth is here, but at the same time, London just seems beat up. 

Gee, I'm really not a fan of this city am I.... Maybe I should find a place in trendy SoHo next time. Or I could mix with the academic set over by the Russell Square and the British Museum! I'll say this much: London feels diverse! And maybe a little edgy (as I watch three masked guys cavort on bikes, looking for a pocket to pick or a smart phone to snatch.)  And full of energy. And life, and even at the late hour.

(waiting, but only for so long, for the light)


For now, I'm happy with my pleasant and small and quiet and slightly but not entirely old fashioned hotel. 

And now it's late and I am feeling like the ground underneath my feet has shifted, as if there'd been a tectonic movement of plates, putting me elsewhere in this world, far away from Warsaw, far away from my past, so that I can settle again into what is now, here before me. Who knows, maybe in the morning, London will seem fabulous. I am keeping an open mind!